Terry Burr designed that beautiful educational infographic for Osiris Educational and Visible Learning Plus. The infographic is based on data from John Hattie’s research and the work of the Visible Learning Plus team.
(c) www.osiriseducational.co.uk / www.visiblelearningplus.co.uk
[…] Visible Learning visualized in a beautiful infographic | Visible Learning […]
[…] Visible Learning visualized in a beautiful infographic | Visible Learning […]
[…] Terry Burr designed that beautiful educational infographic for Osiris Educational and Visible Learning Plus. The infographic is based on data from John Hattie’s research and the work of the Visible Learning Plus team. […]
[…] is something that can benefit all students. Parental engagement works. It is one of Hattie’s top seven effects on student learning , most parents have been shown to want to get more involved. I think that in Thailand, the culture […]
[…] Terry Burr designed that beautiful educational infographic for Osiris Educational and Visible Learning Plus. The infographic is based on data from John Hattie’s research and the work of the Visible Learning Plus team. (c) http://www.osiriseducational.co.uk / http://www.visiblelearningplus.co.uk Visible Learning Infografik Visible…Read more › […]
[…] working together. However, we want them to work together! Design for collaboration. According to John Hattie’s research, cooperative learning is in the top 7 for effects on student achievement. Collaboration does not […]
Is there a way to purchse your infographic posters??
For example; How to have an effect on student achievement. Top 7 and Bottom 7 with the colorful cirlce of all the levels of achievement.
I’d like to purchase this inforgraphic as well. The color wheel is genius.
Is there a way to get this infographic ordered for my classroom?
You might try to contact Osiris Educational: care@osiriseducational.co.uk
Why were these “top” and “bottom” 7 chosen? These are not the effects with the highest and lowest effects sizes, respectively. For instance, Piagetian programs are rated quite high, far larger effect size than parental involvement and cooperative learning [both of which are substantially lower than the highest 7 effect sizes]. Things like study skills and teacher-student relationships are not mentioned despite both being higher effect sizes than parental involvement and cooperative learning. On the bottom side, most of the lowest are not listed: TV, retention, student control over learning, teacher subject matter knowledge…among others. Principal/leadership is FAR greater than the lowest 7 [as is homework]. I do not understand why these particular 14 were chosen? what is the methodology, because the numbers do NOT support these choices.